new rule(s)...
no show = kicked from league and -100 posts.
Vote on 3 other battles or get D/Q from your battle.
All those in Favour say what Effect Said...
"K Rules (and so does JaiCee's idea) and should help Slik mod this...."
new rule(s)...
no show = kicked from league and -100 posts.
Vote on 3 other battles or get D/Q from your battle.
All those in Favour say what Effect Said...
"K Rules (and so does JaiCee's idea) and should help Slik mod this...."
a mandatory 4 links is kind of crazy though... people have a hard enough time with 2 for OM. ha
A ruthless
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
of everything existing.Po'ethicsabstanticollective.
im in for the kiked out of league thing
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
3 should be sufficient, providing every1 don't vote on the same battles...
I've already voted on 7 or 8 battles... Trying to keep the SS league active all on own if I have too...
I agree with the kickin out if u no show......but i'm not so sure about the link thing.....i agree with MindleSS, people do hav a hard enuff time gettin 2 links for OM so i dunno if it'll work here.
Battles:
Come and get it.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I already hit up Mike about the loosing posts.. he said its gay, which yes, when i thought about it was
if you no show in SS you will not be let back into the league
*stickies thread, and edits Effects first post with what i posted in the Beef thread*
as of this week... so all the people this week??? i think this week shouldent but next week should...
^ no.. i pm'd everyone of them 2 days before it was due, and some of them didnt even check in
they signed up, they should remember to show.
As the league moves on I will probably let the decent heads back in.. as for now, no.
Whats the deal with people having to explain votes...? A sentance isn't really enough to breakdown a vote surely?
^no, a sentance generally isnt enough...
A ruthless
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
of everything existing.Po'ethicsabstanticollective.
lol word.. ussually you dont need to go into great feedback, even though if you do they probably will too
but just something liek...
x- you had good this, good that, nice this, work on that, pretty cool approach, liked this, liked that.. yada yada yada.............................................. ..................................................
y - you had good this, good that, nice this, work on that, pretty cool approach, liked this, liked that.. yada yada yada.............................................. ..................................................
so "Y" didnt have enough of this and was lacking on this, even though his blah was good it wasnt enough to beat "X's" blah..
So vote - "X"
....is fine
word^ thats how its done.
A ruthless
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
of everything existing.Po'ethicsabstanticollective.
and if they don't?
lol @ my pic being in the new topics section.
i like those rules, and his sig too^
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Overall Rap Battle Record ~118Wins~10Losses~
Posting Rules
