WK 11: JEM(3-6) Vs Joe Boston(3-7) - JB Wins

[Spree]

Punches due by THURSDAY
Voting closes SUNDAY
NEW BATTLES GO UP RIGHT AFTER

Check Ins
If you can't check in then there's something wrong w/ you
I won't be penalizing for not checking in though. Just make sure you drop a bar

No Shows
1 no show gets you taken out of the "in" roster. You will have to sign back in the next week
2 no shows gets you taken out of the "in" roster for 2 weeks
3 no shows gets you booted from the league for the rest of the season

Voting
Everyone is required to vote on 5 BATTLES MINIMUM. CONTENDERS AND CHAMP BEING MANDATORY
1 vote deduction for every battle link missed
Failure to vote at all will result in a boot from the league for 1 week
If your opponent no shows, you must vote on the required minimum to get the win

Battle Rules
NO FEEDING FROM OPPONENTS BAR IF THEY DROP FIRST
In the event of a 3-way, each battler must drop 2 bars; 1 for each opponent
Battler must drop a bar to get a win, even if their opponent no shows/doesn't check
NO EXTENSIONS. It's only 1 bar
NO editing punches after opponent drops
Biting will result in a league/site ban
Recycling will result in DQ 1st time and League Ban 2nd time
@JEM. @Joe Boston

[Joe Boston]

check

[JEM.]

two.

[Joe Boston]

They claim this herb is underrated I’ll tell him he sucks because what his pen constricts
So once I hand Jemele I hope he leaves quicker than her during those espn conflicts

[JEM.]

You fat fuck w no power moves. Ya girl’s sick of ur board game & is getting at me
Cuz with SUCH a flabby chess no wonder she calls you a pond that acts like a queen

[YG]

Thought Jem came too forced here to take the W

I liked Boston’s coulda been worded better but got the job done here imo

V/Joe

[CleverWordz]

Cool battle..

Joe: Not a bad approach to what angle you were heading. Though, I think your wordplay wasn't bad just didn't fit well with the subject at hand. Actually the wording following the nameplay gave out a forceful sentence to read... That's what drew points away from me along with connecting a consistent punch.

Jem: You weren't that great neither tbh.. But I understood the message you tried to convey with a board game concept. Chess was too simple to predict along with pawn and the queen etc. If it tied onto a better execution then I can see where the potential meets.

Overall this was a hard decision to make according to the lack of wording both had with average jabs they swung. So slightly I have to lean on JEM. I didn't like how Joes wordplay was going and it affected him because the setup was nice. JEM had some weak shit too.. But his average punch did enough to capture my attention more.

Vote- JEM

[MV]

Hmm this is tough. Jem I like your concepts and how you try to get really intricate with your bars but here I believe you made the mistake of adding Soo much substance tsht you over looked the punch. All the tie in are ther3 but it's just not landit in my opinion. Young fox news has a soon punch but there is a punch there.joe you came a bit simple in this Match up but it was enough for me to lean in your favor.
V/Joe Budden I mean boston

[Zunto]

After reading joes I thought for sure the other guy was gonna win no matter what but nope. He dropped something that didn’t make a lick of sense tbh. I’ve seen joe drop a lot better but at leesst it was better than his opponents here.


Vote JB

[Smog]

Felt jems force hurt him..felt joe executed poor n jem had the better creativity but the force killed the bar.. good try but gotta go JB here



JB

[Greedy]

Jem- u went for the chess angle.
Problem is thats a played concept. Also pond/pawn is forved

Joe-
Urs was forced too tbh. But had more impact than Jem

Vote joe b

[Ryno]

I'm going Joe. Both were pretty bad but I liked Joecs concept more.

V. Jb

[Spree]

Joe wins